HirenBhakta
Windows Server 2008 VS. Mac OS X Server 10.6 Snow leopard This is a comparison of both the Windows Server 2008 and Mac OS X Server. I'm going to do Pros and Cons of both Operating Systems and compare them in real world environment such as: Small Business of 50 Users. This Article will involve everything from user computer to server hardware. To understand the full information both Server OS's I will include prices for everything that this Small Business will need in their Office.
Cost of the Software & Hardware
When I went to research on the prices for Server hardware and the Server OS, I found that Dell had good options for the both. So, i build these packages from Dell for the server hardware with Windows Server 2008 EE. The thing was for Dell is that it start from small price, then i start adding up same spec as the competitor and price was more then the other. However, Apple hardware seems expensive at first, but in reality it same or in some case less then the windows servers. Apple has it's Xserve and it comes with Mac OS X Server and thats unlimited license.
Windows Server Infrastructure
- Windows Server With Hardware
- (2) Dell PowerEdge R810 Servers (customized) - $14,400 ($7,200/e)
- Windows Server 2008 EE (included in Hardware + 20 CAL's)
- (30) User CAL's - $1,200
- (50) Dell OptiPlex 380MT Desktops (customized) - $55,000 ($1,100/e)
- Total Cost of the Infrastructure is $70,600
Macintosh Server Infrastructure
- Apple Xserve With Mac OS X Server
- (2) Xserve (customized) - $6,400 (3,200/e)
- Mac OS X Server 10.6 Snow Leopard (included with Xserve)
- Unlimited license
- (50) iMac's (customized) - $60,000 ($1,200/e)
- Total Cost of the Infrastructure is $66,400
Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Overview
Windows Server 2008 is great overall product it self, but all the microsoft's bullshit ways of making money is making me sick and it's making some areas of windows server not good. Windows Server 2008 major jump from Windows Server 2003, and there are lot of areas where microsoft has improved their roles and services. Also, Windows Server 2008 has some under the hood changes that improves the Overall Operating System.
Features
These are just few new and enhanced features of Windows Server.
- Server Core- CLI Server
- Active Directory Roles
- Failover Clustering
- Windows PowerShell
- Self-healing NTFS
- Hyper-V
- Server Manager
Pros
These are good reasons to consider Windows Server 2008
- Major overhaul of OS
- New and Improved Roles
- Improved Featured & Services
- Enhances Core Technology
- Active Directory Enhancement
- Server Manager for easy management for server
- Network Access Protection
Cons
These are few reasons to consider and it might change somes to consider to different OS.
- Overall cost of Windows Server 2008 licensing fees
- Every user will need additional license fee CAL's
- Microsoft want every penny from business
- Many new features are not compatible with older Windows desktop and server systems
- Upgrades to existing servers will need careful planning
- More care is needed when purchasing Terminal Service Client Access Licences
- .NET framework and PowerShell are not available in Server Core configurations
- Training is required to make good use of the Server Core option
- Some Roles are too complicated to set up in Windows Server
Overall
Windows Server 2008 is great server operating system and has great feature that server should have, but it's not that great when you start using at in real world. It all looks good on paper, but once you know what you going to do with servers and managing servers in business network it will be a big hassel that no administrator want in business. Microsoft is 800 pound gorilla in client operating system market, and they know they will need windows server when those clients are getting bigger in numbers. Sometime some business don't choices and they go with Microsoft, because they provide support for there product. In reality this is all bullshit to me. I think Windows Server Sucks and Microsoft got their own head up their ASS.